• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Compliance Mitigation

Compliance Mitigation

Government Investigations / White Collar Crime

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Services
    • Investigations
    • Mitigation
    • White Collar
    • Reputation
    • Case Studies
    • Training
  • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Texas Heart Hospital False Claims Act scheme

You are here: Home / Resilience / Texas Heart Hospital False Claims Act scheme

April 8, 2021 By Roman

Situation

Physician-owners at a respected hospital in Texas violated federal law by improperly charging Medicare when referring patients from their facility to another office in which they had a vested financial interest. After former employees filed a whistleblower, Hospital settled the civil action with the Department of Justice Civil Division.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this Case Study, participants should: 

  • Understand basic concepts of the False Claims Act;
  • Describe how Whistleblowers and Qui Tam actions can negatively affect a business;
  • Learn how the Department of Justice can bring a civil action against a business;
  • Explain ways to avoid becoming involved in federal investigation; and
  • Identify how to show federal investigators a business complies with the law. 

State of the Industry

Recent whistleblower, or Qui Tam lawsuits, in the healthcare industry resulted in massive settlements in favor of the federal government. Pfizer recently paid $2.3 billion, and GlaxoSmithKline recently paid $3 billion. When healthcare companies and other businesses fail to examine their internally written compliance plans, they expose all stakeholders to the costs of federal investigations, fines, and lawsuits.

Businesses and corporations of any size can come under the scrutiny of the United States federal government. These federal investigations can lead to years of turmoil for the business, exorbitant legal fees, and tens of thousands of dollars of lost revenue due to the business owners’ or leaders’ diverted attention. Compliance procedures can assist business of any size prove no intentional wrongdoing to government investigators.

Background and Analysis

This case study profiles a respected Texas hospital referred to federal investigators by two whistleblowers via a civil lawsuit. All the information in this background comes from two sources: one Department of Justice press release, and one newspaper article.

In this case, a whistleblower / Qui Tam lawsuit alerted federal investigators with the Justice Department’s Civil Division were to wrongdoing by Texas Heart Hospital of the Southwest LLP and THHBP Management Company, LLC (Hospital). 

  • According to Whistleblowers.gov, federal whistleblower statutes protect employees from retaliation for reporting violations of federal laws with which the company must comply. The Whistleblower statute process mandates the employees file a civil lawsuit, called a Qui Tam action, against their employer in the name of the United States of America alleging some type of specific wrongdoing. If any proceeds from the defendants exist at the end of the lawsuit, the whistleblowers share those proceeds with the US government. 

Here, two former physicians with the Hospital filed a Qui Tam action against the hospital and its subsidiary alleging the Hospital violated federal Physician Self-Referral Law, the Stark Law, and federal Anti-Kickback Statutes.

According to the lawsuit, the Hospital had an annual 48 patient-contact requirement for each to maintain their ownership-interest in the Hospital. Physician-owners fulfilled the 48 patient-contact requirements by making referrals to other medical providers with which Hospital had a vested financial interest, while both Hospital and the other medical providers billed Medicare for their services.

The Qui Tam lawsuit alleged a violation of the Stark Law, which prohibits a hospital from submitting bills to Medicare for services if the physicians who make the referral to the hospital have a vested financial interest with that medical provider, unless an exception to the rule exists.

Additionally, federal anti-kickback statutes prohibit hospitals and other healthcare providers from providing any type of financial benefits to another to obtain patient referrals for services covered by federally funded programs like Medicare. According to the Qui Tam lawsuit, the Hospital’s ownership policy mandated the physician-owners perform this task 48 times per year.

In this case study, the Hospital agreed to pay $48 million to the US government as a result of the violations of federal law. According to the DOJ’s Civil Division, the two whistleblowers will each receive an even split of their portion of the settlement which amounts to a total of $13,920,000, which is approximately 28 percent of the Hospital’s settlement with the government.

Recommendation

We recommend that employers offer more training on white collar crime. Most compliance programs focus on best practices for performing duties. For example, a healthcare company’s compliance programs may focus on matters like storage, or cleanliness. Undoubtedly, those courses add value. With the rise in prosecutions for white collar crime, however, we recommend that business leaders should train on such cases. Such training will lessen the number of people that participate in schemes like violating the Stark Act.

Although the facts of the Hospital case show corporate involvement in an illegal scheme, other businesses do not have to fall into the same downward spiral.

In this case, the hospital agreed to settle the civil Qui Tam lawsuit for $48 million. Small and mid-sized businesses can avoid falling victim to the same result by implementing a written internal compliance program to show business leaders and employers its intention to fully comply with the laws in its given industry.

Poor management or bad leadership can wreak havoc on a business and result in civil lawsuits or more severe federal criminal investigations. 

Sources 

  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/texas-heart-hospital-and-wholly-owned-subsidiary-thhbp-management-company-llc-pay-48-million
  • https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/strategy/texas-heart-hospital-pay-48m-alleged-kickback-settlement
  • https://www.law360.com/articles/1339505/texas-hospital-to-pay-48m-to-end-false-claims-suit

Was this post helpful?

Let us know if you liked the post. That’s the only way we can improve.

Filed Under: Resilience

Compliance Mitigation Can Help You:

  • Free: Subscribe to our YouTube channel to access more than 800 videos that will help you understand more about the journey ahead. Learn strategies to succeed.
  • Free: Subscribe to our iTunes podcast to listen and learn while you drive or exercise.
  • Books: Buy books for $25 (shipping included) to learn from strategies that empowered me while I climbed through 26 years in prison, allowing me to succeed upon release (Get free digital book with any paperback purchase).
  • Courses: Enroll in our self-directed, digital courses that will help you build mitigation strategies that lead to best outcomes through judicial proceedings, sentencing, and prepare you for a successful journey through prison ($97 to $297).
  • Consulting: Collaborate with our team of mitigation experts to engineer a pathway that will help you ($400 per hour, fully refundable if you choose it’s not right for you. Learn more about our process).

Sign up to receive more information and tools.

 

Primary Sidebar

Risk Mitigation

Qualify for Non-Prosecution Agreements by showing the story of your company’s journey, and yours..

Mitigate Risk

Compliance Case Studies

1. Non-Prosecution Agreements

2. Executive Summary: Investigations

3. Defrauding Investors: SEC

4. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

5. Theranos: FDA Rules

6. Dish Networks Fraud (FTC)

7. Kickbacks Schneider Electric

8. FINRA Rules and Compliance

9. HIPPA Violations

10. Case-Study Library

11. Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Free Trial

Free 30-day trial of our courses, including Compliance 101. Avoid government investigations.

Free Sample

Mitigation Case Studies

1. Mitigation Plan

2. Learn About PSR

3. Before Sentencing

4. Attorneys and Narratives

5. Tactics to Succeed

6. Federal Sentencing Guidelines

7. Aberrant Behavior

8. Diminished Capacity

9. Federal Judge’s Advice

10. Early Release

Free Consultation

Our mitigation experts will help you engineer a strategy for success at any stage in your journey.

Book Now

Keynote Speeches

1. Pioneer Industries

2. Silicon Valley

3. California Wellness

4. Tedx Talk

5. Teaching in Prison

6. University of Washington

7. UC Berkeley

8. Executive Summary: Investigations

9. Testimonials

10. Our Story

11. Our Deck

Blog

Our Most Recent Articles

Follow

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Compliance Mitigation - Logo
Prison Professors Story

Compliance Mitigation Story

See timeline that led to Compliance Mitigation and learn more about why you will grow stronger with the resources we provide

Learn More

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

BUSINESS

Corporate Information
Business Model
W9 Blank PDF
Independent Contractor Agreement

Contact

Compliance Mitigation / Division of Earning Freedom
32565 Golden Lantern, Suite B1026
Dana Point, CA 92629
United States
Team@ComplianceMitigation.com

Earning Freedom Properties

Prison Professors
White Collar Advice
Michael Santos Personal

Navigation

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Store
  • Mitigation
  • Contributors
  • Contact

Newsletter

Stay up to date by subscribing to our newsletter.
Trustpilot

Copyright © 2023 · Compliance Mitigation (an Earning Freedom company) · Privacy Policy and Terms of Use