• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Compliance Mitigation

Compliance Mitigation

Government Investigations / White Collar Crime

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Services
    • Investigations
    • Mitigation
    • White Collar
    • Reputation
    • Case Studies
    • Training
  • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Serving on Board of Directors

You are here: Home / Resilience / Serving on Board of Directors

April 3, 2021 By Michael Santos

Serving on Board of Directors

Video File

Situation

When Tom, a well respected Certified Financial Planner and licensed attorney, accepted an invitation to serve on the Board of Directors of a tech company start-up, he did not disclose the position to his employer.

A client learned that Tom sat on the Board of a rival company; the client terminated his relationship with Tom’s employer and moved his sizable accounts to another firm. As a result of Tom’s position on the Board of another company, his employer terminated him. The employer alleged that Tom violated the company’s conflict of interest policy when he failed to disclose his Board position and compensation. An SEC investigation followed.

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this Case Study, participants should:

  • Understand basic principles of corporate governance
  • Understand and evaluate critical economic and non-economic issues to consider and learn how to perform due diligence before serving on a Board
  • Develop proper and regular reporting requirements for Board service

State of the Industry  

As businesses in all sectors compete in an ever-changing and dynamic marketplace, leaders seek experienced and diverse individuals to serve on their Boards. Companies will typically offer qualified individuals attractive compensation packages for their service, including cash and stock/stock option grants. Often high-profile and successful professionals will serve on multiple Boards.

The Board of Directors (“Board” or “BOD”) is the primary governing entity of a corporation. The Boards of both public and private companies usually include key leaders, such as the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Operating Officer. In addition, companies regularly seek outside experts to create diverse and dynamic governance. Outside directors need to evaluate invitations/nominations to serve on Boards carefully. They should assess potential risks for their current employers, and for themselves.

Background and Analysis

Empire Financial is a financial services company providing comprehensive planning and investment management services to high-net-worth individuals and families. Empire’s typical clients own diversified portfolios of stocks, bonds, mutual funds, and illiquid private investments. 

Tom, a licensed attorney, and Certified Financial Planner, was an Empire partner with more than 25 years of industry experience. Tom earned the respect of his peers and clients.

Several years ago, another party introduced Tom to the CEO of Vista Enterprises, a start-up technology company. Shortly after that meeting, one of Tom’s clients at Empire invested in one of Vista’s early stock offerings. The client had heard of Vista from a friend. Over the years, several of Tom’s other clients at Empire invested in Vista, on Tom’s recommendation.

Vista invested heavily in its technology, but the company had not become profitable.

The CEO of Vista invited Tom to join the company’s Board. Tom discussed the invitation to join Vista’s Board with his client. Since the client had been an early investor in Vista, he thought Tom’s participation on the Board would be a great idea. Tom did not discuss the invitation to participate on Vista’s Board with any other clients that invested in Vista.

A few days later at a social gathering, Tom mentioned the invitation he received to one of his partners at Empire. Tom agreed to join Vista’s Board. He did not sign any documents memorializing the decision, but he began attending Vista’s Board meetings. During those meetings Tom discovered that Vista did not have as much capital as others led him to believe.

The Board offered Tom and other directors generous cash and stock packages for their service. Vista’s CEO announced that Vista would book the cash compensation as a loan against the company’s stock. The CEO confirmed that he and the CFO had researched this creative tax strategy that other companies used.

Vista continued to experience financial difficulties, but Tom did not share this information with his partners or clients at Empire. One of Vista’s lead institutional investors sued Vista to remove the CEO and the Board. Several Empire clients learned of the lawsuit and discovered that their investment had plummeted in value. They terminated their client relationship with Empire. 

Empire terminated Tom “For Cause,” citing a violation of the company’s conflict of interest policy.

The SEC launched a government investigation. It sought disgorgement of the compensation Tom received while serving on Vista’s Board, as well as fines and penalties. The SEC also referred the matter to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) to review potential criminal tax fraud charges.

ANALYSIS:  

Tom felt flattered when Vista’s CEO offered him a Board position. He thought the Board position would open opportunities to use his business and legal skills to help the company succeed. Further, the Board position would put him in a position to monitor his clients’ investments in the company.

Tom had served on the local Little League’s advisory board, so he knew how Board meetings worked. Tom did not perceive any legal or ethical improprieties with serving on Vista’s Board. Despite good intentions, he failed to understand and disclose his acceptance of the Board position to his colleagues at Empire and to all of his clients. Further, he did not anticipate myriad responsibilities that accompany a Board position.

By participating on Vista’s Board, Tom put himself, his firm, and his clients at risk. Empire also did not have proper procedures in place. The following list summarizes some of the critical issues that the parties did not properly manage:

Tom’s Issues/Responsibilities

  • Before accepting Vista’s offer, Tom had a responsibility to inquire and review the following:
  1. Inspect the company’s organizational/legal documents, including corporate resolutions, Board minutes, Bylaws, and Board policies.
  2. Review the financial statements and tax returns and direct any questions to the Audit Committee or independent accountants.
  3. Review the company’s Directors and Officers’ (“D&O”) liability insurance coverage.
  4. Confirm any past Board compensation and potential future compensation.
  • Tom had a fiduciary relationship both with his Empire business partners and with his clients. Accordingly, he had a duty to disclose the potential board position and provide sufficient information for anyone to determine if a conflict of interest existed.  If a conflict did exist, it would need to be waived in writing. Also, Tom should have received written approval from Empire to serve on Vista’s Board.
  • When Tom was offered the director’s compensation package, he should have requested independent confirmation from Vista’s accountants and the structure’s attorneys. Tom should have disclosed the compensation to Empire.
  • Despite Vista’s deteriorating financial condition, Tom failed to disclose this to his Empire Partners or clients, several of whom made follow-on investments in Vista.

Empire’s Issues/Responsibilities

  • Empire should have had a formal written policy for its partners and employees to serve on boards, including disclosure requirements, reporting requirements, and compensation limits.
  • Empire’s Client Services Agreement should inform clients of any Board positions held by partners or employees.
  • Empire should establish minimum D&O liability coverage to protect the firm and its clients adequately.

Recommendations

The Board of Directors is the essential governing body for both public and private companies. Serving as a director comes with enormous responsibility. For this reason, before accepting an invitation to participate as a Board director, individuals should complete their due diligence. They should assess all risks, and make sure that they document all decisions. 

If a potential Director has a position with another company, the individual should consult with the company’s general counsel before accepting an invitation to participate on a Board. Employers should write clear policies regarding employee Board service.

Try it free! Compliance Mitigation Learning Management System

Was this post helpful?

Let us know if you liked the post. That’s the only way we can improve.

Filed Under: Resilience

Compliance Mitigation Can Help You:

  • Free: Subscribe to our YouTube channel to access more than 800 videos that will help you understand more about the journey ahead. Learn strategies to succeed.
  • Free: Subscribe to our iTunes podcast to listen and learn while you drive or exercise.
  • Books: Buy books for $25 (shipping included) to learn from strategies that empowered me while I climbed through 26 years in prison, allowing me to succeed upon release (Get free digital book with any paperback purchase).
  • Courses: Enroll in our self-directed, digital courses that will help you build mitigation strategies that lead to best outcomes through judicial proceedings, sentencing, and prepare you for a successful journey through prison ($97 to $297).
  • Consulting: Collaborate with our team of mitigation experts to engineer a pathway that will help you ($400 per hour, fully refundable if you choose it’s not right for you. Learn more about our process).

Sign up to receive more information and tools.

 

Primary Sidebar

Risk Mitigation

Qualify for Non-Prosecution Agreements by showing the story of your company’s journey, and yours..

Mitigate Risk

Compliance Case Studies

1. Non-Prosecution Agreements

2. Executive Summary: Investigations

3. Defrauding Investors: SEC

4. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

5. Theranos: FDA Rules

6. Dish Networks Fraud (FTC)

7. Kickbacks Schneider Electric

8. FINRA Rules and Compliance

9. HIPPA Violations

10. Case-Study Library

11. Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Free Trial

Free 30-day trial of our courses, including Compliance 101. Avoid government investigations.

Free Sample

Mitigation Case Studies

1. Mitigation Plan

2. Learn About PSR

3. Before Sentencing

4. Attorneys and Narratives

5. Tactics to Succeed

6. Federal Sentencing Guidelines

7. Aberrant Behavior

8. Diminished Capacity

9. Federal Judge’s Advice

10. Early Release

Free Consultation

Our mitigation experts will help you engineer a strategy for success at any stage in your journey.

Book Now

Keynote Speeches

1. Pioneer Industries

2. Silicon Valley

3. California Wellness

4. Tedx Talk

5. Teaching in Prison

6. University of Washington

7. UC Berkeley

8. Executive Summary: Investigations

9. Testimonials

10. Our Story

11. Our Deck

Blog

Our Most Recent Articles

Follow

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Compliance Mitigation - Logo
Prison Professors Story

Compliance Mitigation Story

See timeline that led to Compliance Mitigation and learn more about why you will grow stronger with the resources we provide

Learn More

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

BUSINESS

Corporate Information
Business Model
W9 Blank PDF
Independent Contractor Agreement

Contact

Compliance Mitigation / Division of Earning Freedom
32565 Golden Lantern, Suite B1026
Dana Point, CA 92629
United States
Team@ComplianceMitigation.com

Earning Freedom Properties

Prison Professors
White Collar Advice
Michael Santos Personal

Navigation

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Store
  • Mitigation
  • Contributors
  • Contact

Newsletter

Stay up to date by subscribing to our newsletter.
Trustpilot

Copyright © 2023 · Compliance Mitigation (an Earning Freedom company) · Privacy Policy and Terms of Use