• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Compliance Mitigation

Compliance Mitigation

Government Investigations / White Collar Crime

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Services
    • Investigations
    • Mitigation
    • White Collar
    • Reputation
    • Case Studies
    • Training
  • Contributors
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Consumer Products Safety Commission Investigated Kidde

You are here: Home / Resilience / Consumer Products Safety Commission Investigated Kidde

April 8, 2021 By Roman

Situation

Kidde, a manufacturer of fire suppressant products, failed to report defects in its products to the Consumer Product Safety Commission. After federal investigators learned of the defects and injuries to consumers, the manufacturer lied to investigators. In this case study, we see what happens when this business failed to comply with federal law and lied to investigators.

Learning Objectives

participants should: 

  • Learn about the Consumer Product Safety Commission; 
  • Identify meanings of terms like Consent Decree, and Civil Lawsuit;
  • Describe penalties for violations of the Consumer Product Safety Act;
  • Explain how a business’ failure to comply with federal law can cost millions of dollars; and
  • Understand ways a business can protect against becoming involved in a federal investigation.

State of the Industry

Consumer products have been around for centuries. Defective products injure, maim, or kill people. Federal agencies regulate businesses involved in the sale of all kinds of consumer products. Over the next several decades manufacturers will see more federal regulatory oversight. Businesses should create and enforce a strict compliance plan for their company and train their employees to follow this plan. Otherwise, businesses invite an intrusive, costly federal investigation.

Background and Analysis

This case study focuses on North Carolina-based fire safety product manufacturer Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. (Kidde). According to its website, Kidde manufactures and distributes fire detection and fire suppression products for commercial, industrial, and residential use.  All the information in this case study comes from five sources: one Justice Department (DOJ) press release, one civil complaint against Kidde, one consent order between Kidde and the DOJ, and two news articles.

Congress enacted the Consumer Product Safety Act in 1972 which created the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Within the Act, Congress defined the CPSC’s role within the federal government. The CPSC serves to “protect the public against unreasonable risks of injuries and deaths associated with consumer products.” Congress authorized the CPSC to “develop standards, to pursue recalls, and take actions to investigate violations of the law, and seek to enforce these laws.”

The CPSC recently announced a $12 million settlement of a case against Kidde. According to the CPSC, Kidde fire extinguishers became the subject of a federal investigation for two reasons:

  1. Kidde fire extinguishers became clogged or require excessive force to discharge due to a faulty value;
  2. the nozzle of the fire extinguishers could detach apparently with enough force to cause injuries to people with which it came into contact. 

Both defects could cause the fire extinguishers to fail to discharge during an emergency.  In fact, reports indicate emergency responders could not get Kidde fire extinguishers to work during a car fire resulting in one fatality. According to investigators at the CPSC, Kiddie received 391 reports of defects by November 2017. Kidde failed to report these defects to regulators.

After the investigation concluded, the CPSC referred the matter to the DOJ. The DOJ filed a complaint against Kidde in December 2020. The Complaint alleged Kidde violated the CPSA. The DOJ alleged Kidde’s violations included:

  1. Significantly underreporting the scope and nature of the defect and risks prior to the recall; 
  2. Failing to report information about nozzles detaching from fire extinguishers to the CPSC;
  3. Intentionally making misrepresentations to the CPSC during its investigation; and 
  4. Misusing a registered safety certification mark.  

The CPSC complaint also alleged Kidde employees materially misrepresented facts surrounding the regulator’s investigation into these products. Employees lied to investigators when asked if Kidde had provided all relevant documents in its’ possession and control.

Within a week of the complaint, Kidde agreed to settle the case by way of a consent decree. A consent decree represents a settlement agreement between a plaintiff and a defendant. In this case, Kidde agreed to pay $12 million in penalties.

Consent Decrees resolve all disputes between two parties. The parties will next request the court to enter the agreement into the court records.  If the court agrees, the court will maintain supervision over the case to ensure Kidde’s compliance with the decree.

Kidde agreed to continue its operations with a new compliance plan designed to ensure compliance with all federal laws, including the CPSA. The Consent Decree requires Kidde’s compliance plan to contain nine specific items. All nine items relate to Kidde having a written, specific compliance plan in place going forward.

Additionally, Kidde agreed to continue to operate with internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that product safety and compliance documentation gets reported to the CPSC.  These compliance requirements are ongoing with specific reporting requirements in place for three years.

Recommendation 

We recommend that companies bring in subject-matter experts to help them identify risks. The companies should design compliance training programs that will minimize exposure to government investgiations and potential charges for white-collar crime. In this case, employees lied to government investigators. Those lies, could have, and may have, resulted in charges for lying to a federal officer.

By learning about white-collar crime, team leaders will lower risk levels for costly government investigations and civil penalties, as experienced by Kidde.

Sources 

  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/fire-extinguisher-manufacturer-ordered-pay-12-million-penalty-delay-and-misrepresentations
  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1350541/download
  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1350536/download
  • https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/kidde-fire-extinguisher-settlement-179493/
  • https://www.aboutlawsuits.com/fire-extinguisher-recall-78112/

Was this post helpful?

Let us know if you liked the post. That’s the only way we can improve.

Filed Under: Resilience

Compliance Mitigation Can Help You:

  • Free: Subscribe to our YouTube channel to access more than 800 videos that will help you understand more about the journey ahead. Learn strategies to succeed.
  • Free: Subscribe to our iTunes podcast to listen and learn while you drive or exercise.
  • Books: Buy books for $25 (shipping included) to learn from strategies that empowered me while I climbed through 26 years in prison, allowing me to succeed upon release (Get free digital book with any paperback purchase).
  • Courses: Enroll in our self-directed, digital courses that will help you build mitigation strategies that lead to best outcomes through judicial proceedings, sentencing, and prepare you for a successful journey through prison ($97 to $297).
  • Consulting: Collaborate with our team of mitigation experts to engineer a pathway that will help you ($400 per hour, fully refundable if you choose it’s not right for you. Learn more about our process).

Sign up to receive more information and tools.

 

Primary Sidebar

Risk Mitigation

Qualify for Non-Prosecution Agreements by showing the story of your company’s journey, and yours..

Mitigate Risk

Compliance Case Studies

1. Non-Prosecution Agreements

2. Executive Summary: Investigations

3. Defrauding Investors: SEC

4. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

5. Theranos: FDA Rules

6. Dish Networks Fraud (FTC)

7. Kickbacks Schneider Electric

8. FINRA Rules and Compliance

9. HIPPA Violations

10. Case-Study Library

11. Deferred Prosecution Agreements

Free Trial

Free 30-day trial of our courses, including Compliance 101. Avoid government investigations.

Free Sample

Mitigation Case Studies

1. Mitigation Plan

2. Learn About PSR

3. Before Sentencing

4. Attorneys and Narratives

5. Tactics to Succeed

6. Federal Sentencing Guidelines

7. Aberrant Behavior

8. Diminished Capacity

9. Federal Judge’s Advice

10. Early Release

Free Consultation

Our mitigation experts will help you engineer a strategy for success at any stage in your journey.

Book Now

Keynote Speeches

1. Pioneer Industries

2. Silicon Valley

3. California Wellness

4. Tedx Talk

5. Teaching in Prison

6. University of Washington

7. UC Berkeley

8. Executive Summary: Investigations

9. Testimonials

10. Our Story

11. Our Deck

Blog

Our Most Recent Articles

Follow

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
Compliance Mitigation - Logo
Prison Professors Story

Compliance Mitigation Story

See timeline that led to Compliance Mitigation and learn more about why you will grow stronger with the resources we provide

Learn More

Footer

Social

Follow along on social media.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

BUSINESS

Corporate Information
Business Model
W9 Blank PDF
Independent Contractor Agreement

Contact

Compliance Mitigation / Division of Earning Freedom
32565 Golden Lantern, Suite B1026
Dana Point, CA 92629
United States
Team@ComplianceMitigation.com

Earning Freedom Properties

Prison Professors
White Collar Advice
Michael Santos Personal

Navigation

  • Start
  • Testimonials
  • Store
  • Mitigation
  • Contributors
  • Contact

Newsletter

Stay up to date by subscribing to our newsletter.
Trustpilot

Copyright © 2023 · Compliance Mitigation (an Earning Freedom company) · Privacy Policy and Terms of Use